The three main benefits of lean manufacturing, if implemented correctly, are 1) a reduction in inventory levels 2) it exposes inefficiencies on the production floor and 3) it reduces waste. One of the key elements of lean manufacturing is the deployment of a Kanban system.

While there different types of Kanban systems, a simplistic definition is it represents a Demand-Pull production approach where customer orders dictate what is manufactured as opposed to the more traditional Demand-Push where the manufacturing organization is tasked with producing specific quantities for specific parts to meet an approved sales forecast for a given period. One of the critical keys to success of a Kanban system is to have an efficient/effective Just-in-Time inventory system so that inventory can be delivered to the factory quickly to satisfy inventory requirements for an order received.

Technically, a Kanban inventory system uses a Kanban (a graphic or visual signal; e.g. color coded cards or lights) that indicate to manufacturing to produce another unit or to replenish inventory on-the-manufacturing-line. Its intent is to minimize inventory levels on the manufacturing floor and to control the quantity of production for a particular product.

A simple example is described below in Scenario 1:

Scenario 1

Lean Manufacturing/Kanban 101 Image Scenario 1

The manufacturing process would be:

In comparison, if a Work Order system is used (Scenario 2) then the below manufacturing process would be used. The important element in this scenario is the 10 units for Part A were considered part of the 100 unit forecast that manufacturing used in their production planning.

Scenario 2

Lean Manuacturing/Kanban 101 Image Scenario 2

The two biggest risks that often are associated with Kanban are 1) if a large order quantity is received, the Kanban system may find it difficult to produce the required quantity in time for the requested delivery date to the customer and 2) If the manufacturing production cycles are long the manufacturing floor space required to keep the production flowing might become extensive.

Recently I was walking through a warehouse with the owner of a small distributor, when one of his employees brought him a widget that had been damaged by a forklift. The owner told him to trash the widget, and tell accounting to write it off; the value of this widget, $170. This got me thinking, “are they aware of the cost to replace this widget?”

Later, I asked the warehouse person how much they would need in sales to replace this widget; he said $170. Well, not exactly, let me explain.

In order to replace the cost of the damaged widget, the money must come from the margin of future sales. This company earns a 2% margin for this widget, so they must sell 50 widgets, just to pay for the widget that was damaged! That is $8,500 in additional sales!

$170/.02 = $8,500 in new sales needed to replace damaged widget

$8,500/$170 = 50 widgets

This example doesn’t take into account carrying costs; if carrying costs were 30%, the replacement cost would be $11,050!

This chart illustrates additional sales required to make up for lost/stolen/damaged inventory:

Gross Margin
Item Value2%3%4%5%6%
$25$1,250$833625$500$417
$50$2,500$1,667$1,250$1,000$833
$100$5,000$3,333$2,500$2,000$1,667
$200$1,0000$6,667$5,000$4,000$3,333
$500$2,5000$1,6667$12,500$10,000$8,333
$1,000$50,000$33,333$25,000$20,0000$16,667

Again, to breakeven on lost, damaged or stolen inventory, the replacement cost comes from future profits! How much harder must your sales team work to make up for damaged, lost or stolen inventory?

These little inventory costs that occur daily and weekly add up over time, and at the end of the year, these “little” costs can have a substantial effect on the bottom line. Therefore, it is important for employees to understand costs associated with inventory, and the impact it has on the company’s financials.